Skip to content
KENNAN · DISPATCH · 2026.06.28 · NYC · LON · FRA

Use cases

Built for in-house finance, deal teams, and advisory.

One workspace for the work that ships every cycle — the actuals, the model, the deliverable. We meet finance teams where the work already happens: in the memo, in the IC pack, in the deck.

Who Kennan is built for

01
CFOs · finance directors
corporate development

The board pack, the budget cycle, the strategic memo.

Cycle work that used to span Excel, email, and a Google Doc lives in one workspace. The actuals get cleaned and consolidated. The budget runs as a model with sources cited. The board commentary writes alongside the numbers, not after them.

Deliverables
  • Monthly close → board pack
  • Budget and forecast cycle
  • Strategic memos for the audit committee
  • Corp dev diligence and acquisition workups
02
Deal teams · investment committees
portfolio operations

The IC memo, the LP update, the portfolio review.

From CIM to IC memo without the version sprawl. The model and the writeup live in the same workspace. The sensitivity grid is on the deliverable when the partner asks the “what if” — not in a follow-up two days later.

Deliverables
  • IC memo from CIM
  • Add-on diligence and modeling
  • Quarterly LP update materials
  • Portfolio company quarterly reviews
03
Coverage · product
M&A advisory

The pitch book, the comp tables, the football field.

Sector research, comp sets, and valuation work happen in the workspace. The deck exports to .pptx for the client meeting. Multiple pitches in parallel without the version sprawl of a Friday-night drafting room.

Deliverables
  • Sector pitch books
  • M&A pitch materials and CIM support
  • Football fields, comp tables, valuation summaries
  • Fairness opinion supporting analysis

The work itself

Three steps. One workspace. Real output.

Across all three workflows, the work breaks down to the same three steps: clean and consolidate the data, build the model, produce the deliverable. Below, real output from a captured Kennan workspace — Klaviyo (KVYO), public filings.

§ 01 · Data cleaning + consolidation

The messy export becomes structured data, with sources cited.

An earnings press release table, a multi-sheet Excel actuals export, a PDF data room file — parsed, normalized, and joined into one schema. Every figure traces to a source. No retyping, no reconciliation between sheets, no “where did this number come from” on the eve of the board meeting.

Raw inputklaviyo-q4-press-release.pdf · p. 7
Selected Financial Data (in thousands, except per share)
FY22FY23FY24FY25
Revenue472,718698,193937,0281,234,000
Cost of revenue123,402181,776230,891279,452
Gross profit349,316516,417706,137948,438
Operating loss(50,180)(45,910)(8,612)29,418
Adj. EBITDA(28,402)19,872120,418218,041
Includes deferred revenue. GAAP. FY25 restated per 8-K filed Mar 12, 2026.
Workspace · sourced tablekvyo_financials.xlsx
FY22FY23FY24FY25
Revenue ($M)472.7698.2937.01,234.01
Cost of revenue ($M)123.4181.8230.9279.51
Gross profit ($M)349.3516.4706.1948.41
Gross margin (%)73.974.075.477.2c
Operating income ($M)(50.2)(45.9)(8.6)29.42
Adj. EBITDA ($M)(28.4)19.9120.4218.01
Adj. EBITDA margin (%)(6.0)2.812.817.8c
1 press release · 2 8-K restated · c computed7 rows · 5 columns · schema locked

Illustrative · Klaviyo FY22–FY25 actuals normalized from filings · every figure traces to its source

§ 02 · Modeling

The forecast runs as a program. The sensitivity is on the deliverable.

Assumptions become a stored Python program. Change a single input and every scenario reruns. The sensitivity grid is part of the output, not a separate sheet that someone has to maintain in parallel.

Assumptions5 inputs
FY25 revenue (anchor)$1,234.0Mfilings
Net revenue retention (NRR)110%driver
New logo growth14% YoYtrend
FY28 EBITDA margin (base)25.5%derived
Customer count growth15.2% CAGRtrend
revenue_forecast.py · stored program
5 scenarios emitted in one run
deterministic · re-runs on any assumption change
FY28 NRR sensitivity$ M
NRR 100%
NRR 105%
NRR 110%
NRR 115%
NRR 120%
Revenue
1,791
1,955
2,126
2,304
2,490
EBITDA
308
422
542
667
797
EBITDA mgn
17.2%
21.6%
25.5%
28.9%
32.0%
Each 5pp of NRR moves FY28 revenue by ~$175M. The deal thesis hinges on this row.

Captured Kennan workspace · KVYO forecast · one program, 5 scenarios, one run

§ 03 · Presentations

The chart, the table, the prose — formatted into the deliverable.

The workspace renders to .pdf, .docx, or .pptx. Charts and tables come out of the same data that produced the model — no re-typing, no chart-image-paste, no Friday-night reconciliation between the deck and the underlying numbers.

Pklaviyo-pitch.pptx— PowerPoint
FileHomeInsertDesignTransitionsAnimationsSlide ShowReviewView
Section IV · ValuationConfidential · Draft

Valuation summary

Trading and intrinsic value framework — $11.4–$12.8B implied enterprise value
Revenue forecast
$ millions · FY24A–FY28E
937
FY24A
1,234
FY25A
1,520
FY26E
1,823
FY27E
2,126
FY28E
ActualForecast
FY24A–FY28E CAGR: 22.7%
Enterprise value framework
$ billions · midpoint marked
EV / NTM Revenue
$11.4
EV / FY28E EBITDA
$12.8
DCF (10% WACC)
$12.1
52-week trading range
$11.9
$8.0$10.0$12.0$14.0$16.0
Slide 12 of 24English (United States)100%

Illustrative valuation slide · the same model data renders to .pptx — chart, table, prose, no re-paste, no reconciliation

Bring a real deliverable. We’ll wire it up in one workspace.

The board memo on your desk, the CIM on your laptop, the pitch your MD asked for — bring the actual work and we’ll show you how it runs in Kennan.